Computer Science Engineering

Student outcomes describe the knowledge, skills, and behaviors students are expected to demonstrate by the time of graduation. The program documents adopt six outcomes from the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC) and seven from the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABET, using the 2026–2027 criteria as a reference.

For assessment purposes, these thirteen outcomes are organized into eight thematic groups. This grouping does not replace or alter the individual outcomes; assessment evidence and results remain traceable to each CAC and EAC outcome.

Accreditation status. The program is not currently ABET-accredited. The alignment described on this page does not constitute a statement of ABET accreditation.

Student Outcomes

The table below presents the eight assessment groups and the full wording of the thirteen individual outcomes retained in the program documents.

C1–C6: Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC). E1–E7: Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC). C6 corresponds to the CAC Computer Science Program Criteria; the other outcomes correspond to the respective commission’s General Criteria.

Student Outcomes by Assessment Group
Assessment GroupOutcomeFull Outcome Statement
1. Complex Problem SolvingC1Analyze a complex computing problem and apply principles of computing and other relevant disciplines to identify solutions.
E1An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics.
2. Design and ImplementationC2Design, implement, and evaluate a computing-based solution to meet a given set of computing requirements in the context of the program’s discipline.
E2An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors.
3. Effective CommunicationC3Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts.
E3An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences.
4. Professional and Ethical IssuesC4Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles.
E4An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.
5. TeamworkC5Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program’s discipline.
E5An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.
6. CS Theory and Software FundamentalsC6Apply computer science theory and software development fundamentals to produce computing-based solutions.
7. ExperimentationE6An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions.
8. Self-LearningE7An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.

Program Educational Objectives

Program educational objectives describe the accomplishments expected of graduates within a few years after graduation. They are distinct from student outcomes, which address capabilities at the time of graduation.

Within a few years after graduation, CSE graduates are expected to:

Program Educational Objectives
ObjectiveStatement
PEO 1 — ExpertiseEstablish themselves as competent computing and engineering professionals who apply technical expertise and problem-solving skills to create innovative solutions to real-world challenges in industry, research, or entrepreneurial settings.
PEO 2 — IntegrityContribute responsibly to society through ethical professional practice, considering public welfare, environmental sustainability, and the social context of the Dominican Republic and the global community.
PEO 3 — AdaptabilityAdvance professionally through lifelong learning, graduate education, professional development, certifications, or participation in professional communities, remaining current in an evolving technological landscape.
PEO 4 — SynergyAssume productive roles in multidisciplinary and multicultural professional environments, contributing through effective communication, collaboration, and leadership in local and global organizations.

Assessment and Continuous Improvement

The assessment model described in the program documents combines direct evidence from upper-level courses and the CSE Capstone Project with indirect evidence from exit surveys, alumni surveys, and employer feedback.

The eight thematic groups organize the assessment process while preserving each individual outcome. Evaluation of the evidence supports the identification of strengths, areas requiring attention, and actions for continuous improvement.

ABET Criteria References

The following official criteria serve as references for the documented alignment: